There are at least three network shows that prominently
feature their lead actress in dual roles: “Fringe,” “Vampire Diaries,” and
“Ringer.” This isn’t a new concept and I can name numerous times when an actor
has gotten to act opposite themselves on their own show but I’m curious as to
why it’s becoming such a hot trend now? And is it always worth it?
NOTE: There may be spoilers for episodes that have already aired within this post. If you are spoiler-sensitive, continue reading at your own risk.
“Fringe:” Olivia vs
Fauxlivia
What works best about the dual roles on “Fringe” is that
they’ve all come about naturally. This show is true sci-fi so the idea of
parallel universes just works. What’s even better is that the way we came to
recognize the existence of one alternate reality in particular was natural and
the way it become so pivotal to the story was authentic. There was a real need
for the actors to take on dual roles.
Everyone in the cast who has a doppelganger does a fantastic
job in differentiating between the two but no one does it quite like Anna Torv with
her portrayals of Olivia Dunham and her counterpart, nicknamed Fauxlivia.
Watching them on the screen, it’s often hard to believe that they’re played by
the same actress – and not just because they have different hair colors. The
way Fauxlivia carries herself with confidence and – dare I say it – swagger is
so believable and distinct that you’d swear someone else plays Olivia, who is
far more collected and introspective. It’s astounding that the Emmys and the
Golden Globes don’t recognize “Fringe” as it is but to snub Torv for her
stellar performances is outrageous.
Now, what’s bad about the dual roles? Some may say it has
created a noticeable shift in focus among the leads. Torv is often carrying the
show with her two Dunhams while her fellow leads, Joshua Jackson and John
Noble, have somewhat smaller roles in recent seasons than they ever have
before. Personally, I don’t agree with this simply because the doppelgangers
are no different from any other new character. Yes, Torv is doing more work
these days but the story does is a good job of giving each of the main
characters a moment to shine and each season has focused on a different one of
the three leads (season two was about Walter, three was Olivia’s, and four is
about Peter).
For me, the worst part is that Olivia and Fauxlivia aren’t
interacting in every episode!
“Vampire Diaries:”
Elena vs Katherine
We knew all along that Nina Dobrev would end up having to
play the seductive vampire, Katherine, alongside the innocent and mortal Elena
because the idea of a doppelganger has been integrated into the show’s
mythology from the very beginning. It was the entire reason that the story even
began: Stefan returned to Mystic Falls to get to know Elena because she looked
exactly like Katherine. So we saw Dobrev tackle her second role in flashbacks
to the nineteenth century, which was enjoyable, but the moment Katherine
entered our lives in the present, it was clear that we would never want her to
leave.
Like Anna Torv on “Fringe,” Dobrev makes the two characters
so distinct. Elena is often sweet and humble and idealistic; she is an
outrageously beautiful girl-next-door. Katherine is sexy and violent and
selfish. “Vampire Diaries” fans have figured out the system for knowing when
Dobrev is playing Katherine versus playing Elena: Katherine often has wavy hair
while Elena’s will be perfectly straightened. But, fortunately, we don’t have
to pay attention to the hairstyles 24/7 because the way Dobrev struts while
she’s Katherine or smiles with puppy-dog eyes as Elena can tip off us right
away.
The downfall to the use of a doppelganger on “Vampire
Diaries” is probably just the fact that Dobrev is so good that we wish
Katherine was a permanent fixture and not a vagabond villain. Sure, we can
point out some disappointments with the overall mythology and the reason that
Katherine and Elena look exactly alike but that’s a matter of personal taste.
Overall, Dobrev’s dual role has paid off and now fans are
constantly waiting to see when Katherine will cause trouble for our heroine,
Elena, again – and given the way Dobrev lights up when she plays the vampire, I
think it’s safe to say that she’s dying for Katherine to return as well.
“Ringer:” Bridget vs
Siobhan
Now let’s talk about a show that is founded completely upon a
dual role: “Ringer.” Everyone was over the moon when it was revealed that Sarah
Michelle Gellar would be returning to television and the initial glimpses of
her show were extremely exciting. The concept: a troubled woman, Bridget, takes
on her twin Siobhan’s life in order to save herself from certain death after
her sister commits suicide – but little does she know that Siobhan faked her
death and has been pulling the strings from the beginning. Fascinating, right?
Confusing, right?
Unfortunately, the show has had many problems from the
beginning, no matter how hard Gellar and the cast tried to make the most of the
material. One of such problem that I had was with Gellar’s portrayal of the two
twins. If you looked away for a second and the scenes changed, you could be
looking at Gellar’s face but not know which twin she was playing. This happened
to me on multiple occasions. Once Siobhan was back in New York and interacting
with characters from her old life – who Bridget had been interacting with for
half a season – it was sometimes even more confusing. Some episodes tried to
differentiate the twins by letting Bridget keep her hair down while Siobhan
wore hers up but this wasn’t consistent – within episodes or throughout the
season. Unfortunately, Gellar didn’t make a clear division between the
characters either and, when she did, it didn’t feel quite as authentic as it
does with Anna Torv or Nina Dobrev because it relied too heavily on dialogue
and not enough on body language and personality.
Perhaps this isn’t a problem with Gellar so much as a
problem with the concept. Bridget is pretending to be Siobhan so of course she
would take on some of Siobhan’s characteristics. But when scenes with Siobhan
were cut together with Bridget-as-Siobhan scenes, the confusion was off the
charts. But what were they to do? If Bridget and Siobhan had different hair
colors, then they wouldn’t be able to trade off identities, right? Even if
Bridget dyed her hair when she was Siobhan, then Siobhan wouldn’t be able to
pretend to be herself and people who were a part of Siobhan’s mystery plans in
Paris would know that Bridget wasn’t the same woman. The concept is too
convoluted to really allow the twins to be distinct characters.
The show did improve in its final episodes – as did Gellar’s
performances – but it’s looking extremely unlikely that “Ringer” will be back
for a second season due to low ratings.
So what do you think? Is it just me or is having a
doppelganger the new cool thing? Do you wish the doppelganger fad hadn’t taken
off? Who do you think does the best job with dual roles – Torv, Dobrev, Gellar,
or someone else entirely? Let’s hash it out in the comments!
I really loved Gellar as Siobhan and Bridget but I feel like everyone felt differently towards the show than I did.
ReplyDeleteDo writers not check spelling anymore?
ReplyDeleteMy name's Ryan. I've lived all over and been to a lot of schools but what's always been consistent is my love for writing. My focus is primarily in ficiton and scriptwriting
Cool and that i have a dandy present: Whole House Reno residential renovation contractor
ReplyDelete